No Evidence for “Safety Concerns” Despite multiple requests for specific examples, data, or documentation, neither US Rowing nor World Rowing has provided evidence that VI athletes pose safety risks. Both organizations demand proof that VI athletes can compete safely, yet won’t allow VI athletes to race – creating an impossible standard where we’re required to provide evidence we’re prevented from gathering. The incident frequently referenced (Genoa 2024) involved a non-para crew capsizing in challenging wave conditions – an inherent risk of coastal rowing that affects all athletes regardless of classification. Notably, junior athletes (under 18) competed at the same event and continue to be welcomed in the sport, yet adult VI athletes are deemed too unsafe to participate.

Discriminatory Double Standard US Rowing demands “substantial data” and “weighty and complete” evidence from VI athletes to reverse the bylaw, yet the bylaw was enacted with no evidence that VI athletes pose safety risks. We’re being asked to prove we’re safe when no other athletes – para or able-bodied – are required to prove this.

Decisions Made Without Athletes The bylaw was created and enforced without consulting the athletes it affects. Visually impaired rowers were excluded from discussions about our own eligibility. When we provided research, expert analysis, and proposed safety solutions, they were dismissed.

Pattern of Exclusion This isn’t an isolated incident. VI athletes have also been excluded from U23 PR3 1x events. This pattern signals a troubling shift away from inclusion in emerging rowing disciplines.

Why This Matters
This exclusion sets a dangerous precedent: governing bodies can remove entire classifications of athletes based on disability alone, without evidence, consultation, or justification.

If they can do this to visually impaired rowers, they can do it to anyone.

I’ve competed successfully for over a decade – including multiple beach sprint medals – with zero safety incidents.